Mental Skills for Orthopaedic Surgery.

Orthopaedic surgery training focuses primarily on the knowledge base and surgical techniques that comprise the fundamental and physical pillars of performance. It also pays much less attention to the mental pillar of performance than does the training of other specialists such as aviators, elite athletes, musicians, and Special Forces operators. However, mental skills optimize the ability to achieve the ideal state during surgery that includes absolute focus with the right amount of confidence and stress. The path to this state begins before surgery with visualization of the surgical steps and potential complications. On the day of surgery, the use of compartmentalization, performance aspirations, performance breathing, and keeping the team focused facilitates achieving and maintaining the proper mental state. Considering the similarities between surgery and other fields of expertise that do emphasize the mental pillar, including this training in orthopaedic residencies, is likely beneficial.

Femoral Fixation Strength as a Function of Bone Plug Length in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Utilizing Interference Screws.

PURPOSE: To determine femoral construct fixation strength as bone plug length decreases in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: Sixty fresh-frozen bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts were utilized and divided into 20-, 15-, and 10-mm length bone plug groups, subdivided further so that half utilized the patella side (P) for testing and half used the tibial side (T). Ten mm diameter recipient tunnels were created within the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament footprint of 60 cadaveric femurs. All bone plugs were 10 mm in diameter; grafts were fixed using a 7 × 23 mm metal interference screw. An Instron was used to determine the load to failure of each group. A one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was conducted to test the hypothesis that there would be one or more mean differences in fixation stability between 20- or 15-mm plug lengths (P or T) versus 10 mm T plug lengths when cross-compared, with no association between other P or T subgroups. RESULTS: The mean load to failure of the 20 mm plugs (20 P + T) was 457 ± 66N, 15 mm plugs (15 P + T) was 437 ± 74N, and 10 mm plugs (10 P + T) was 407 ± 107N. There was no significant difference between P + T groups: 20-versus 15-mm (p = 1.000), 15-versus 10-mm (p = 0.798), and 20-versus 10-mm (p = 0.200); P + T MANOVA (p = 0.291). Within groups, there was no significant difference between patella and tibial bone plug subgroups with a pullout force range between 469 ± 56N and 374 ± 116N and p-value ranging from p = 1.000 for longer bone plugs to p = 0.194 for shorter bone plugs; P versus T MANOVA (p = 0.113). CONCLUSION: In this human time zero cadaver model, there was no significant difference in construct failure between 20-,15-, and 10-mm bone plugs when fixed with an interference screw within the femoral tunnel, although fixation strength did trend down when from 20- to 15- to 10-mm bone plugs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: There is a balance between optimal bone plug length on the femoral side for achieving adequate fixation as well as minimizing donor site morbidity and facilitating graft passage in ACLR. This study reveals utilizing shorter plugs with interference screw fixation is potentially acceptable on the femoral side if shorter plugs are harvested.

Double-Row Capsulolabral Repair Increases Load to Failure and Decreases Excessive Motion.

PURPOSE: Using a cadaver shoulder instability model and load-testing device, we compared biomechanical characteristics of double-row and single-row capsulolabral repairs. We hypothesized a greater reduction in glenohumeral motion and translation and a higher load to failure in a mattress double-row capsulolabral repair than in a single-row repair. METHODS: In 6 matched pairs of cadaveric shoulders, a capsulolabral injury was created. One shoulder was repaired with a single-row technique, and the other with a double-row mattress technique. Rotational range of motion, anterior-inferior translation, and humeral head kinematics were measured. Load-to-failure testing measured stiffness, yield load, deformation at yield load, energy absorbed at yield load, load to failure, deformation at ultimate load, and energy absorbed at ultimate load. RESULTS: Double-row repair significantly decreased external rotation and total range of motion compared with single-row repair. Both repairs decreased anterior-inferior translation compared with the capsulolabral-injured condition, however, no differences existed between repair types. Yield load in the single-row group was 171.3 ± 110.1 N, and in the double-row group it was 216.1 ± 83.1 N (P = .02). Ultimate load to failure in the single-row group was 224.5 ± 121.0 N, and in the double-row group it was 373.9 ± 172.0 N (P = .05). Energy absorbed at ultimate load in the single-row group was 1,745.4 ± 1,462.9 N-mm, and in the double-row group it was 4,649.8 ± 1,930.8 N-mm (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: In cases of capsulolabral disruption, double-row repair techniques may result in decreased shoulder rotational range of motion and improved load-to-failure characteristics. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In cases of capsulolabral disruption, repair techniques with double-row mattress repair may provide more secure fixation. Double-row capsulolabral repair decreases shoulder motion and increases load to failure, yield load, and energy absorbed at yield load more than single-row repair.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation of the Brachium: An Anatomic Study of Musculocutaneous and Radial Nerve Motor Points Relative to Proximal Landmarks.

PURPOSE: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) offers enhanced prosthetic use by harnessing additional neural control from unused nerves in the amputated limb. The purpose of this study was to document the location and number of motor end plates to each muscle commonly used in TMR in the brachium relative to proximally based bony landmarks. METHODS: We dissected 18 matched upper limbs (9 fresh-frozen cadavers). The locations of each of the nerves' muscular insertions into the medial biceps and brachialis were measured relative to the anterolateral tip of the acromion. The terminal branches to the lateral triceps were measured relative to the posterolateral tip of the acromion. Both the number of branches and the location of the muscular insertions were documented. Common descriptive statistics were used to describe the data. RESULTS: There was a median of 2 branches to the medial biceps located 19.6 cm from the anterolateral tip of the acromion (range, 15-25 cm). There was a median of 3.5 branches to the brachialis located 24.2 cm from the anterolateral tip of the acromion (range, 19-27.5 cm). There was a median of 2.5 branches to the lateral triceps located 21.6 cm from the posterolateral tip of the acromion (range, 11-29 cm). The mean distances to the primary branch muscle and the number of smaller branches were not significantly different when compared by sex or side. CONCLUSIONS: Motor points for the medial biceps, brachialis, and lateral triceps can be identified reliably using proximal landmarks in targeted muscle reinnervation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The data obtained from this study may assist the surgeon in localizing the nerve branches and muscular insertions for the commonly used muscles for TMR of the brachium.